People in Ramsay ward should prepare themselves for more severances in their neighborhood or even a small subdivision in their back yard. The majority of Council has chosen to ignore our Town planner’s advice and now want to expand residential development in the rural wards.
At present only three councillors accept our planner’s advice: me, Val Wilkinson and John Edwards. The other eight want more—ranging from a bit more to much more.
What Val, John and I have in common and the others lack is experience building two community official plans; the first in Ramsay in the 1990s, and the second early after amalgamation. We also know that Ramsay will bear the brunt of new growth based on past growth patterns. And we remember that no one in Ramsay supported estate lot subdivisions during previous official plan meetings.
At a Council meeting in November, we met to discuss minor extensions to the severance policy. Mayor Levi jumped in early with a motion that, if accepted, would have added thousands of new severances. The discussion had barely started. The majority voted against the premature motion due to it lack of restrictions.
At our first meeting in February, our planner presented further options. Once again, the Mayor barged in with a motion—this one to permit estate lot subdivisions without restrictions. Again, his motion was defeated. (Both motions nearly won—the defeat came on a 5-5 tie. Had Rickie Minnille been present, his past voting record suggests both motions would have passed.)
The cumulative effect of both defeated motions was to shut down discussions on COP changes. Our procedural rules prevent reintroducing previous motions or similar motions. On February 8, the Mayor, through his staunch supporter, Denzil Ferguson, moved a motion to suspend the rules and restart discussions on rural development. Suspension is the nuclear bomb of motions. It sets back the clock. Once moved, no debate is permitted. It motion requires a two-thirds majority to pass—it did. The effect was to set aside previous negative votes and hand the mayor and his supporters a blank sheet.
One of the odd angles in this debate is the enthusiasm shown by Almonte councillors for growth in the rural wards. At least two complain that Almonte is growing too fast and may max out sewage treatment capacity sooner than expected. This notion, which is not supported by data, according to the planner, verges on bizarre. The town built the sewage plant so that is could grow. Three of the four sitting Almonte reps voted for that growth. And now they want to meddle in Ramsay after accelerating growth in their own ward.
Meetings to Come
On March 6, Council will have a special meeting to again discuss rural development options. If the Mayor can restrain his enthusiasm, we might have a meaningful discussion. However the debate goes, people in Ramsay should be prepared for increased housing in that ward.
John, Val and I will ask for a public meeting to air the options and get feedback. It is too soon to tell if such will occur or if all members of Council will listen.